|
|
Amendment of public contract
Milev, Ivan ; Horáček, Tomáš (advisor) ; Liška, Petr (referee)
Modification of a Public Contract Abstract The objective of this diploma thesis is to comprehensively analyze the regulations pertaining to modifications of a public contract, i.e. the obligation of the public contract according to the Public Procurement Act No. 134/2016 Coll. and according to European law, as well as to place it into the wider context of contract law according to Act No. 89/2012 Coll., The Civil Code. Furthermore, the aim of the thesis is to point out certain issues with the interpretation of the current legislation, as well as its shortcomings which have an effect on its applicability. The thesis is divided into five chapters. In the first chapter, general private law terminology is introduced － the obligation and the contract － which is then placed into the context of public procurement in the second chapter. The third chapter covers the main subject of this thesis, i.e. it outlines the purpose, history, context and structure of the current legislation and also presents the problem of placing the legislation of public contract modification into general civil legislation, all while respecting the autonomy originating from European law, which unavoidably creates conflicts which the author points out. In the fourth chapter, individual rules for determining substantial and non-substantial...
|
|
|
Modification of a Public Contract
Chlupáč, Martin ; Horáček, Tomáš (referee)
Modification of a Public Contract This thesis deals with the regulation of modifications made to public contracts during their term. Its aim is to critically analyse the legal regime for modifying public contracts in light of the law of the European Union (especially Directive 2014/24/EU on public procurement) and of the Czech Republic (The Public Procurement Act No. 134/2016 Coll.). The thesis consists of three chapters. The first chapter focuses on the development of the regulation on public contract modifications from the view of both the EU and Czech prospective, and emphasizes the importance of the so called Pressetext judgment issued by the Court of Justice of the European Union. The second chapter represents the most important part of the thesis, inasmuch as it critically analyses the applicable law. It is divided into two parts. The first one contains an analysis of substantial modifications to public contracts in light of the related case law. In the second part of this chapter, I try to pinpoint interpretation problems that are connected with the new provisions which define situations, in which the modification is to be regarded as non-substantial, and therefore does not trigger the need to commence a new public procurement procedure. The third chapter provides an outlook on how two other...
|
|
|
Modification of a Public Contract
Chlupáč, Martin ; Horáček, Vít (advisor) ; Horáček, Tomáš (referee)
Modification of a Public Contract This thesis deals with the regulation of modifications made to public contracts during their term. Its aim is to critically analyse the legal regime for modifying public contracts in light of the law of the European Union (especially Directive 2014/24/EU on public procurement) and of the Czech Republic (The Public Procurement Act No. 134/2016 Coll.). The thesis consists of three chapters. The first chapter focuses on the development of the regulation on public contract modifications from the view of both the EU and Czech prospective, and emphasizes the importance of the so called Pressetext judgment issued by the Court of Justice of the European Union. The second chapter represents the most important part of the thesis, inasmuch as it critically analyses the applicable law. It is divided into two parts. The first one contains an analysis of substantial modifications to public contracts in light of the related case law. In the second part of this chapter, I try to pinpoint interpretation problems that are connected with the new provisions which define situations, in which the modification is to be regarded as non-substantial, and therefore does not trigger the need to commence a new public procurement procedure. The third chapter provides an outlook on how two other...
|
guest ::
